Typical scenario

A highlight in a photograph is taken for damage

If a damage claim relies on a bright line in a photograph, the image's evidential capabilities need assessing first. Suppose photographs show the same area under different lighting, but the item itself is unavailable.

What needs to be clarified

Assess which technical image features allow discussion of the visible line and what is missing for an answer about physical damage.

Materials to prepare

  • Original image files without further enhancement or resaving.
  • Information on the source, capture conditions and known image changes.
  • Other photographs of the same area with the disputed location marked.

What to compare

  • Compare the line's position with lighting and camera viewpoint.
  • Check detail and possible effects of file processing.
  • Separate an observed image feature from a property of the item.

Possible outcome of the analysis

An opinion may describe available features, the support for a proposed explanation and the need for another specialist to examine the object.

Limits of the conclusions

Photographic examination does not replace inspection of the goods; a line being invisible in another photograph does not by itself prove the absence of a defect.

Forensic examination of photographic images
Write to usDiscuss your task ↗